File

util.jsonschema: Fix validation to not assume presence of "type" field MattJ reported a curious issue where validation did not work as expected. Primarily that the "type" field was expected to be mandatory, and thus leaving it out would result in no checks being performed. This was likely caused by misreading during initial development. Spent some time testing against https://github.com/json-schema-org/JSON-Schema-Test-Suite.git and discovered a multitude of issues, far too many to bother splitting into separate commits. More than half of them fail. Many because of features not implemented, which have been marked NYI. For example, some require deep comparisons e.g. when objects or arrays are present in enums fields. Some because of quirks with how Lua differs from JavaScript, e.g. no distinct array or object types. Tests involving fractional floating point numbers. We're definitely not going to follow references to remote resources. Or deal with UTF-16 sillyness. One test asserted that 1.0 is an integer, where Lua 5.3+ will disagree.

-- TODO many actually return Maybe(String)
local record lib
	record base64
		encode : function (s : string) : string
		decode : function (s : string) : string
	end
	record stringprep
		nameprep : function (s : string, strict : boolean) : string
		nodeprep : function (s : string, strict : boolean) : string
		resourceprep : function (s : string, strict : boolean) : string
		saslprep : function (s : string, strict : boolean) : string
	end
	record idna
		to_ascii : function (s : string) : string
		to_unicode : function (s : string) : string
	end
	record utf8
		valid : function (s : string) : boolean
		length : function (s : string) : integer
	end
	record confusable
		skeleton : function (s : string) : string
	end
	version : string
end
return lib