Software /
code /
prosody
File
spec/util_rfc6724_spec.lua @ 10453:926d6086a95a
net.websocket: Fix traceback in case of ondisconnect being called twice
We want to figure out what situations the double ondisconnect happens in, and
aim to fix the root cause in the future.
author | Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:29:01 +0000 |
parent | 8236:4878e4159e12 |
line wrap: on
line source
local rfc6724 = require "util.rfc6724"; local new_ip = require"util.ip".new_ip; describe("util.rfc6724", function() describe("#source()", function() it("should work", function() assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2001:db8:3::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")}).addr, "2001:db8:3::1", "prefer appropriate scope"); assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("ff05::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2001:db8:3::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")}).addr, "2001:db8:3::1", "prefer appropriate scope"); assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:2::1", "IPv6")}).addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer same address"); -- "2001:db8:1::1" should be marked "deprecated" here, we don't handle that right now assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6")}).addr, "fe80::2", "prefer appropriate scope"); -- "fe80::2" should be marked "deprecated" here, we don't handle that right now assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3::2", "IPv6")}).addr, "2001:db8:1::2", "longest matching prefix"); --[[ "2001:db8:1::2" should be a care-of address and "2001:db8:3::2" a home address, we can't handle this and would fail assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3::2", "IPv6")}).addr, "2001:db8:3::2", "prefer home address"); ]] assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2002:c633:6401::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2002:c633:6401::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6")}).addr, "2002:c633:6401::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8", "prefer matching label"); -- "2002:c633:6401::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8" should be marked "temporary" here, we don't handle that right now assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::d5e3:0:0:1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8", "IPv6")}).addr, "2001:db8:1::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8", "prefer temporary address") -- "2001:db8:1::2" should be marked "public" and "2001:db8:1::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8" should be marked "temporary" here, we don't handle that right now end); end); describe("#destination()", function() it("should work", function() local order; order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("198.51.100.121", "IPv4")}, {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("169.254.13.78", "IPv4")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer matching scope"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "198.51.100.121", "prefer matching scope"); order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("198.51.100.121", "IPv4")}, {new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("198.51.100.117", "IPv4")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "198.51.100.121", "prefer matching scope"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer matching scope"); order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("10.1.2.3", "IPv4")}, {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("10.1.2.4", "IPv4")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer higher precedence"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "10.1.2.3", "prefer higher precedence"); order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")}, {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "fe80::1", "prefer smaller scope"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer smaller scope"); --[[ "2001:db8:1::2" and "fe80::2" should be marked "care-of address", while "2001:db8:3::1" should be marked "home address", we can't currently handle this and would fail the test order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")}, {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer home address"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "fe80::1", "prefer home address"); ]] --[[ "fe80::2" should be marked "deprecated", we can't currently handle this and would fail the test order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")}, {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "avoid deprecated addresses"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "fe80::1", "avoid deprecated addresses"); ]] order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3ffe::1", "IPv6")}, {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3f44::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "longest matching prefix"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2001:db8:3ffe::1", "longest matching prefix"); order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2002:c633:6401::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6")}, {new_ip("2002:c633:6401::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2002:c633:6401::1", "prefer matching label"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer matching label"); order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2002:c633:6401::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6")}, {new_ip("2002:c633:6401::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer higher precedence"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2002:c633:6401::1", "prefer higher precedence"); end); end); end);