Software / code / prosody
File
util-src/time.c @ 13762:81856814d74f 13.0
util.argparse: Fix bug (regression?) in argument parsing with --foo=bar
After recent changes, '--foo bar' was working, but '--foo=bar' was not. The
test had a typo (?) (bar != baz) and because util.argparse is not strict by
default, the typo was not caught.
The typo caused the code to take a different path, and bypassed the buggy
handling of --foo=bar options.
I've preserved the existing test (typo and all!) because it's still an
interesting test, and ensures no unintended behaviour changes compared to the
old code.
However I've added a new variant of the test, with strict mode enabled and the
typo fixed. This test failed due to the bug, and this commit introduces a fix.
| author | Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| date | Tue, 11 Mar 2025 18:27:36 +0000 |
| parent | 12976:a187600ec7d6 |
line wrap: on
line source
#ifndef _POSIX_C_SOURCE #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L #endif #include <time.h> #include <lua.h> static lua_Number tv2number(struct timespec *tv) { return tv->tv_sec + tv->tv_nsec * 1e-9; } static int lc_time_realtime(lua_State *L) { struct timespec t; clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &t); lua_pushnumber(L, tv2number(&t)); return 1; } static int lc_time_monotonic(lua_State *L) { struct timespec t; clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &t); lua_pushnumber(L, tv2number(&t)); return 1; } int luaopen_prosody_util_time(lua_State *L) { lua_createtable(L, 0, 2); { lua_pushcfunction(L, lc_time_realtime); lua_setfield(L, -2, "now"); lua_pushcfunction(L, lc_time_monotonic); lua_setfield(L, -2, "monotonic"); } return 1; } int luaopen_util_time(lua_State *L) { return luaopen_prosody_util_time(L); }