Software / code / prosody
File
spec/util_poll_spec.lua @ 13762:81856814d74f 13.0
util.argparse: Fix bug (regression?) in argument parsing with --foo=bar
After recent changes, '--foo bar' was working, but '--foo=bar' was not. The
test had a typo (?) (bar != baz) and because util.argparse is not strict by
default, the typo was not caught.
The typo caused the code to take a different path, and bypassed the buggy
handling of --foo=bar options.
I've preserved the existing test (typo and all!) because it's still an
interesting test, and ensures no unintended behaviour changes compared to the
old code.
However I've added a new variant of the test, with strict mode enabled and the
typo fixed. This test failed due to the bug, and this commit introduces a fix.
| author | Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| date | Tue, 11 Mar 2025 18:27:36 +0000 |
| parent | 12400:728d1c1dc7db |
line wrap: on
line source
describe("util.poll", function() local poll; setup(function() poll = require "util.poll"; end); it("loads", function() assert.is_table(poll); assert.is_function(poll.new); assert.is_string(poll.api); end); describe("new", function() local p; setup(function() p = poll.new(); end) it("times out", function () local fd, err = p:wait(0); assert.falsy(fd); assert.equal("timeout", err); end); it("works", function() -- stdout should be writable, right? assert.truthy(p:add(1, false, true)); local fd, r, w = p:wait(1); assert.is_number(fd); assert.is_boolean(r); assert.is_boolean(w); assert.equal(1, fd); assert.falsy(r); assert.truthy(w); assert.truthy(p:del(1)); end); end) end);