File

spec/util_hashring_spec.lua @ 12180:53e0ae770917

util.xml: Do not allow doctypes, comments or processing instructions Yes. This is as bad as it sounds. CVE pending. In Prosody itself, this only affects mod_websocket, which uses util.xml to parse the <open/> frame, thus allowing unauthenticated remote DoS using Billion Laughs. However, third-party modules using util.xml may also be affected by this. This commit installs handlers which disallow the use of doctype declarations and processing instructions without any escape hatch. It, by default, also introduces such a handler for comments, however, there is a way to enable comments nontheless. This is because util.xml is used to parse human-facing data, where comments are generally a desirable feature, and also because comments are generally harmless.
author Jonas Schäfer <jonas@wielicki.name>
date Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:23:54 +0100
parent 10007:de43ca319184
child 12794:249b01adc54a
line wrap: on
line source

local hashring = require "util.hashring";

describe("util.hashring", function ()

	local sha256 = require "util.hashes".sha256;

	local ring = hashring.new(128, sha256);

	it("should fail to get a node that does not exist", function ()
		assert.is_nil(ring:get_node("foo"))
	end);

	it("should support adding nodes", function ()
		ring:add_node("node1");
	end);

	it("should return a single node for all keys if only one node exists", function ()
		for i = 1, 100 do
			assert.is_equal("node1", ring:get_node(tostring(i)))
		end
	end);

	it("should support adding a second node", function ()
		ring:add_node("node2");
	end);

	it("should fail to remove a non-existent node", function ()
		assert.is_falsy(ring:remove_node("node3"));
	end);

	it("should succeed to remove a node", function ()
		assert.is_truthy(ring:remove_node("node1"));
	end);

	it("should return the only node for all keys", function ()
		for i = 1, 100 do
			assert.is_equal("node2", ring:get_node(tostring(i)))
		end
	end);

	it("should support adding multiple nodes", function ()
		ring:add_nodes({ "node1", "node3", "node4", "node5" });
	end);

	it("should disrupt a minimal number of keys on node removal", function ()
		local orig_ring = ring:clone();
		local node_tallies = {};

		local n = 1000;

		for i = 1, n do
			local key = tostring(i);
			local node = ring:get_node(key);
			node_tallies[node] = (node_tallies[node] or 0) + 1;
		end

		--[[
		for node, key_count in pairs(node_tallies) do
			print(node, key_count, ("%.2f%%"):format((key_count/n)*100));
		end
		]]

		ring:remove_node("node5");

		local disrupted_keys = 0;
		for i = 1, n do
			local key = tostring(i);
			if orig_ring:get_node(key) ~= ring:get_node(key) then
				disrupted_keys = disrupted_keys + 1;
			end
		end
		assert.is_equal(node_tallies["node5"], disrupted_keys);
	end);

	it("should support removing multiple nodes", function ()
		ring:remove_nodes({"node2", "node3", "node4", "node5"});
	end);

	it("should return a single node for all keys if only one node remains", function ()
		for i = 1, 100 do
			assert.is_equal("node1", ring:get_node(tostring(i)))
		end
	end);

end);