Software /
code /
prosody
File
spec/util_rfc6724_spec.lua @ 12586:4c8941b5b05e 0.12
core.s2smanager: Don't remove unrelated session on close of bidi session
Normally with bidi, any outgoing connection should be the same as the
incoming, hence when closing a bidi connection it should be removed as a
route to the remote server. However it is not guaranteed, a remote bidi-capable server
might have decided to open a new connection for some reason. This can
lead to a situation where there are two bidi connections, and the s2sout
route is a locally initiated s2sout connection. In this case, such a
s2sout connection should be kept.
Noticed in a rare case where bidi has just been enabled on a running
server, and something establishes new connections immediately when a
connection is closed.
author | Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 27 Jun 2022 01:22:36 +0200 |
parent | 8236:4878e4159e12 |
line wrap: on
line source
local rfc6724 = require "util.rfc6724"; local new_ip = require"util.ip".new_ip; describe("util.rfc6724", function() describe("#source()", function() it("should work", function() assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2001:db8:3::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")}).addr, "2001:db8:3::1", "prefer appropriate scope"); assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("ff05::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2001:db8:3::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")}).addr, "2001:db8:3::1", "prefer appropriate scope"); assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:2::1", "IPv6")}).addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer same address"); -- "2001:db8:1::1" should be marked "deprecated" here, we don't handle that right now assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6")}).addr, "fe80::2", "prefer appropriate scope"); -- "fe80::2" should be marked "deprecated" here, we don't handle that right now assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3::2", "IPv6")}).addr, "2001:db8:1::2", "longest matching prefix"); --[[ "2001:db8:1::2" should be a care-of address and "2001:db8:3::2" a home address, we can't handle this and would fail assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3::2", "IPv6")}).addr, "2001:db8:3::2", "prefer home address"); ]] assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2002:c633:6401::1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2002:c633:6401::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6")}).addr, "2002:c633:6401::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8", "prefer matching label"); -- "2002:c633:6401::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8" should be marked "temporary" here, we don't handle that right now assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::d5e3:0:0:1", "IPv6"), {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8", "IPv6")}).addr, "2001:db8:1::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8", "prefer temporary address") -- "2001:db8:1::2" should be marked "public" and "2001:db8:1::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8" should be marked "temporary" here, we don't handle that right now end); end); describe("#destination()", function() it("should work", function() local order; order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("198.51.100.121", "IPv4")}, {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("169.254.13.78", "IPv4")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer matching scope"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "198.51.100.121", "prefer matching scope"); order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("198.51.100.121", "IPv4")}, {new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("198.51.100.117", "IPv4")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "198.51.100.121", "prefer matching scope"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer matching scope"); order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("10.1.2.3", "IPv4")}, {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("10.1.2.4", "IPv4")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer higher precedence"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "10.1.2.3", "prefer higher precedence"); order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")}, {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "fe80::1", "prefer smaller scope"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer smaller scope"); --[[ "2001:db8:1::2" and "fe80::2" should be marked "care-of address", while "2001:db8:3::1" should be marked "home address", we can't currently handle this and would fail the test order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")}, {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer home address"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "fe80::1", "prefer home address"); ]] --[[ "fe80::2" should be marked "deprecated", we can't currently handle this and would fail the test order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")}, {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "avoid deprecated addresses"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "fe80::1", "avoid deprecated addresses"); ]] order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3ffe::1", "IPv6")}, {new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3f44::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "longest matching prefix"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2001:db8:3ffe::1", "longest matching prefix"); order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2002:c633:6401::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6")}, {new_ip("2002:c633:6401::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2002:c633:6401::1", "prefer matching label"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer matching label"); order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2002:c633:6401::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6")}, {new_ip("2002:c633:6401::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")}) assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer higher precedence"); assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2002:c633:6401::1", "prefer higher precedence"); end); end); end);