Software /
code /
prosody
File
spec/util_hashring_spec.lua @ 12745:2cbf0e9314ff
mod_smacks: Change boolean attribute from '1' to 'true' for compatibility
Conversations 2.10.10 and earlier expect this to be literally 'true' and don't
recognise '1'. This leads to it not attempting resumption with Prosody at all
since this change was introduced in 36ba170c4fd0.
Thanks to Zash for noticing, debugging and diagnosing this issue.
This issue is fixed in Conversations commit 052c58f3 (unreleased at the time
of writing).
author | Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 07 Oct 2022 11:35:56 +0100 |
parent | 10007:de43ca319184 |
child | 12794:249b01adc54a |
line wrap: on
line source
local hashring = require "util.hashring"; describe("util.hashring", function () local sha256 = require "util.hashes".sha256; local ring = hashring.new(128, sha256); it("should fail to get a node that does not exist", function () assert.is_nil(ring:get_node("foo")) end); it("should support adding nodes", function () ring:add_node("node1"); end); it("should return a single node for all keys if only one node exists", function () for i = 1, 100 do assert.is_equal("node1", ring:get_node(tostring(i))) end end); it("should support adding a second node", function () ring:add_node("node2"); end); it("should fail to remove a non-existent node", function () assert.is_falsy(ring:remove_node("node3")); end); it("should succeed to remove a node", function () assert.is_truthy(ring:remove_node("node1")); end); it("should return the only node for all keys", function () for i = 1, 100 do assert.is_equal("node2", ring:get_node(tostring(i))) end end); it("should support adding multiple nodes", function () ring:add_nodes({ "node1", "node3", "node4", "node5" }); end); it("should disrupt a minimal number of keys on node removal", function () local orig_ring = ring:clone(); local node_tallies = {}; local n = 1000; for i = 1, n do local key = tostring(i); local node = ring:get_node(key); node_tallies[node] = (node_tallies[node] or 0) + 1; end --[[ for node, key_count in pairs(node_tallies) do print(node, key_count, ("%.2f%%"):format((key_count/n)*100)); end ]] ring:remove_node("node5"); local disrupted_keys = 0; for i = 1, n do local key = tostring(i); if orig_ring:get_node(key) ~= ring:get_node(key) then disrupted_keys = disrupted_keys + 1; end end assert.is_equal(node_tallies["node5"], disrupted_keys); end); it("should support removing multiple nodes", function () ring:remove_nodes({"node2", "node3", "node4", "node5"}); end); it("should return a single node for all keys if only one node remains", function () for i = 1, 100 do assert.is_equal("node1", ring:get_node(tostring(i))) end end); end);