File

spec/util_hashring_spec.lua @ 11769:071715a18394

mod_pubsub: Move reversal of item order in <items> Examples in XEP-0060 suggest that items should be listed in chronological order, but we get them from the archive in reverse order. However when requesting specific items by id the results keep that order and we don't want to flip it again. At some point it would likely be best to use the archive API directly instead of this util.cache-compatible wrapper.
author Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se>
date Sun, 05 Sep 2021 18:42:44 +0200
parent 10007:de43ca319184
child 12794:249b01adc54a
line wrap: on
line source

local hashring = require "util.hashring";

describe("util.hashring", function ()

	local sha256 = require "util.hashes".sha256;

	local ring = hashring.new(128, sha256);

	it("should fail to get a node that does not exist", function ()
		assert.is_nil(ring:get_node("foo"))
	end);

	it("should support adding nodes", function ()
		ring:add_node("node1");
	end);

	it("should return a single node for all keys if only one node exists", function ()
		for i = 1, 100 do
			assert.is_equal("node1", ring:get_node(tostring(i)))
		end
	end);

	it("should support adding a second node", function ()
		ring:add_node("node2");
	end);

	it("should fail to remove a non-existent node", function ()
		assert.is_falsy(ring:remove_node("node3"));
	end);

	it("should succeed to remove a node", function ()
		assert.is_truthy(ring:remove_node("node1"));
	end);

	it("should return the only node for all keys", function ()
		for i = 1, 100 do
			assert.is_equal("node2", ring:get_node(tostring(i)))
		end
	end);

	it("should support adding multiple nodes", function ()
		ring:add_nodes({ "node1", "node3", "node4", "node5" });
	end);

	it("should disrupt a minimal number of keys on node removal", function ()
		local orig_ring = ring:clone();
		local node_tallies = {};

		local n = 1000;

		for i = 1, n do
			local key = tostring(i);
			local node = ring:get_node(key);
			node_tallies[node] = (node_tallies[node] or 0) + 1;
		end

		--[[
		for node, key_count in pairs(node_tallies) do
			print(node, key_count, ("%.2f%%"):format((key_count/n)*100));
		end
		]]

		ring:remove_node("node5");

		local disrupted_keys = 0;
		for i = 1, n do
			local key = tostring(i);
			if orig_ring:get_node(key) ~= ring:get_node(key) then
				disrupted_keys = disrupted_keys + 1;
			end
		end
		assert.is_equal(node_tallies["node5"], disrupted_keys);
	end);

	it("should support removing multiple nodes", function ()
		ring:remove_nodes({"node2", "node3", "node4", "node5"});
	end);

	it("should return a single node for all keys if only one node remains", function ()
		for i = 1, 100 do
			assert.is_equal("node1", ring:get_node(tostring(i)))
		end
	end);

end);