Software / code / prosody
Comparison
plugins/muc/register.lib.lua @ 11906:ba3344926e18
MUC: Add option to include form in registration query
This was originally not done based on my interpretation of XEP-0045. Today's
reading, however, revealed that it actually says the result
> SHOULD contain **at least** a <username/> element
(emphasis mine)
I take this to mean that including a form **is** allowed (and I think this is
sensible). Tigase already includes the form I believe.
I've gated the new behaviour behind a (default off) option, because it hasn't
been tested for compatibility with clients. My primary desire for it is in
Snikket, where the clients will be tested to ensure compatibility with this.
I don't anticipate that (m)any clients would break, so maybe after 0.12 we can
experiment with enabling it by default and eventually remove the option.
| author | Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| date | Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:11:03 +0000 |
| parent | 11286:336cba957c88 |
| child | 12028:9ab202e942f5 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 11905:bbfa707a4756 | 11906:ba3344926e18 |
|---|---|
| 5 local dataforms = require "util.dataforms"; | 5 local dataforms = require "util.dataforms"; |
| 6 | 6 |
| 7 local allow_unaffiliated = module:get_option_boolean("allow_unaffiliated_register", false); | 7 local allow_unaffiliated = module:get_option_boolean("allow_unaffiliated_register", false); |
| 8 | 8 |
| 9 local enforce_nick = module:get_option_boolean("enforce_registered_nickname", false); | 9 local enforce_nick = module:get_option_boolean("enforce_registered_nickname", false); |
| 10 | |
| 11 -- Whether to include the current registration data as a dataform. Disabled | |
| 12 -- by default currently as it hasn't been widely tested with clients. | |
| 13 local include_reg_form = module:get_option_boolean("muc_registration_include_form", false); | |
| 10 | 14 |
| 11 -- reserved_nicks[nick] = jid | 15 -- reserved_nicks[nick] = jid |
| 12 local function get_reserved_nicks(room) | 16 local function get_reserved_nicks(room) |
| 13 if room._reserved_nicks then | 17 if room._reserved_nicks then |
| 14 return room._reserved_nicks; | 18 return room._reserved_nicks; |
| 126 local reply = st.reply(stanza); | 130 local reply = st.reply(stanza); |
| 127 local registered_nick = get_registered_nick(room, user_jid); | 131 local registered_nick = get_registered_nick(room, user_jid); |
| 128 if stanza.attr.type == "get" then | 132 if stanza.attr.type == "get" then |
| 129 reply:query("jabber:iq:register"); | 133 reply:query("jabber:iq:register"); |
| 130 if registered_nick then | 134 if registered_nick then |
| 131 -- I find it strange, but XEP-0045 says not to include | |
| 132 -- the current registration data (only the registered name) | |
| 133 reply:tag("registered"):up(); | 135 reply:tag("registered"):up(); |
| 134 reply:tag("username"):text(registered_nick); | 136 reply:tag("username"):text(registered_nick):up(); |
| 137 if include_reg_form then | |
| 138 local aff_data = room:get_affiliation_data(user_jid); | |
| 139 if aff_data then | |
| 140 reply:add_child(registration_form:form(aff_data, "result")); | |
| 141 end | |
| 142 end | |
| 135 origin.send(reply); | 143 origin.send(reply); |
| 136 return true; | 144 return true; |
| 137 end | 145 end |
| 138 reply:add_child(registration_form:form()); | 146 reply:add_child(registration_form:form()); |
| 139 else -- type == set -- handle registration form | 147 else -- type == set -- handle registration form |