Software /
code /
prosody-modules
File
mod_muc_moderation/README.markdown @ 5264:d3ebaef1ea7a
mod_http_oauth2: Correctly verify OAuth client credentials on revocation
Makes no sense to validate against username and password here, or using
a token to revoke another token, or itself?
In fact, upon further discussion, why do you need credentials to revoke
a token? If you are not supposed to have the token, revoking it seems
the most responsible thing to do with it, so it should be allowed, while
if you are supposed to have it, you should be allowed to revoke it.
author | Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:57:18 +0100 |
parent | 5127:be859bfdd44e |
child | 5484:bb083e9f78dd |
line wrap: on
line source
# Introduction This module implements [XEP-0425: Message Moderation]. # Usage Moderation is done via a supporting client and requires a `moderator` role in the channel / group chat. # Configuration Example [MUC component][doc:chatrooms] configuration: ``` {.lua} VirtualHost "channels.example.com" "muc" modules_enabled = { "muc_mam", "muc_moderation", } ``` # Compatibility - Basic functionality with Prosody 0.11.x and later - Full functionality with Prosody 0.12.x and `internal` or `sql` storage^[Replacing moderated messages with tombstones requires new storage API methods.] ## Clients - [Converse.js](https://conversejs.org/) - [Gajim](https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/10107) - [clix](https://code.zash.se/clix/rev/6c1953fbe0fa) ### Feature requests - [Conv](https://github.com/iNPUTmice/Conversations/issues/3722)[ersa](https://github.com/iNPUTmice/Conversations/issues/3920)[tions](https://github.com/iNPUTmice/Conversations/issues/4227) - [Dino](https://github.com/dino/dino/issues/1133) - [Poezio](https://lab.louiz.org/poezio/poezio/-/issues/3543) - [Profanity](https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1336)