File

mod_flash_policy/README.markdown @ 4935:a85efae90e21

mod_rest: Expand mapping of XEP-0045 join stanza The previous 'join' mapping was apparently lost in translation when swithing to datamapper, so might as well map some properties allowing history control. Usually you probably want either zero history or history since the last known time of being joined. Maybe that the former should be the default?
author Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se>
date Sat, 30 Apr 2022 01:00:01 +0200
parent 2876:ea6b5321db50
line wrap: on
line source

---
labels:
- 'Stage-Alpha'
summary: Adds support for flash socket policy
...

Introduction
============

This Prosody plugin adds support for flash socket policies. When
connecting with a flash client (from a webpage, not an exe) to prosody
the flash client requests for an xml "file" on port 584 or the
connecting port (5222 in the case of default xmpp). Responding on port
584 is tricky because it requires root priviliges to set up a socket on
a port \< 1024.

This plugins filters the incoming data from the flash client. So when
the client connects with prosody it immediately sends a xml request
string (`<policy-file-request/>\0`). Prosody responds with a flash
cross-domain-policy. See
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/socket\_policy\_files.html
for more information.

Usage
=====

Add "flash\_policy" to your modules\_enabled list.

Configuration
=============

  --------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  crossdomain\_file     Optional. The path to a file containing an cross-domain-policy in xml format.
  crossdomain\_string   Optional. A cross-domain-policy as string. Should include the xml declaration.
  --------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Both configuration options are optional. If both are not specified a
cross-domain-policy with "`<allow-access-from domain="*" />`" is used as
default.

Compatibility
=============

  ----- -------
  0.7   Works
  ----- -------

Caveats/Todos/Bugs
==================

-   The assumption is made that the first packet received will always
    contain the policy request data, and all of it. This isn't robust
    against fragmentation, but on the other hand I highly doubt you'll
    be seeing that with such a small packet.
-   Only tested by me on a single server :)