File

mod_muc_mam_markers/mod_muc_mam_markers.lua @ 5705:527c747711f3

mod_http_oauth2: Limit revocation to clients own tokens in strict mode RFC 7009 section 2.1 states: > The authorization server first validates the client credentials (in > case of a confidential client) and then verifies whether the token was > issued to the client making the revocation request. If this > validation fails, the request is refused and the client is informed of > the error by the authorization server as described below. The first part was already covered (in strict mode). This adds the later part using the hash of client_id recorded in 0860497152af It still seems weird to me that revoking a leaked token should not be allowed whoever might have discovered it, as that seems the responsible thing to do.
author Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se>
date Sun, 29 Oct 2023 11:30:49 +0100
parent 3499:a1fc677d0cc8
line wrap: on
line source

-- mod_muc_mam_markers
--
-- Copyright (C) 2019 Marcos de Vera Piquero <marcos.devera@quobis.com>
--
-- This file is MIT/X11 licensed.
--
-- A module to make chat markers get stored in the MUC archives
--

module:depends"muc_mam"

local function handle_muc_message (event)
	local stanza = event.stanza;
	local is_received = stanza:get_child("received", "urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0");
	local is_displayed = stanza:get_child("displayed", "urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0");
	local is_acked = stanza:get_child("acknowledged", "urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0");
	if (is_received or is_displayed or is_acked) then
		return true;
	end
	return nil;
end

module:hook("muc-message-is-historic", handle_muc_message);

module:log("debug", "Module loaded");