Software /
code /
prosody-modules
File
mod_muc_mam_markers/mod_muc_mam_markers.lua @ 5705:527c747711f3
mod_http_oauth2: Limit revocation to clients own tokens in strict mode
RFC 7009 section 2.1 states:
> The authorization server first validates the client credentials (in
> case of a confidential client) and then verifies whether the token was
> issued to the client making the revocation request. If this
> validation fails, the request is refused and the client is informed of
> the error by the authorization server as described below.
The first part was already covered (in strict mode). This adds the later
part using the hash of client_id recorded in 0860497152af
It still seems weird to me that revoking a leaked token should not be
allowed whoever might have discovered it, as that seems the responsible
thing to do.
author | Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 29 Oct 2023 11:30:49 +0100 |
parent | 3499:a1fc677d0cc8 |
line wrap: on
line source
-- mod_muc_mam_markers -- -- Copyright (C) 2019 Marcos de Vera Piquero <marcos.devera@quobis.com> -- -- This file is MIT/X11 licensed. -- -- A module to make chat markers get stored in the MUC archives -- module:depends"muc_mam" local function handle_muc_message (event) local stanza = event.stanza; local is_received = stanza:get_child("received", "urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0"); local is_displayed = stanza:get_child("displayed", "urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0"); local is_acked = stanza:get_child("acknowledged", "urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0"); if (is_received or is_displayed or is_acked) then return true; end return nil; end module:hook("muc-message-is-historic", handle_muc_message); module:log("debug", "Module loaded");