File

mod_http_stats_stream/example.html @ 5705:527c747711f3

mod_http_oauth2: Limit revocation to clients own tokens in strict mode RFC 7009 section 2.1 states: > The authorization server first validates the client credentials (in > case of a confidential client) and then verifies whether the token was > issued to the client making the revocation request. If this > validation fails, the request is refused and the client is informed of > the error by the authorization server as described below. The first part was already covered (in strict mode). This adds the later part using the hash of client_id recorded in 0860497152af It still seems weird to me that revoking a leaked token should not be allowed whoever might have discovered it, as that seems the responsible thing to do.
author Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se>
date Sun, 29 Oct 2023 11:30:49 +0100
parent 2433:1908e7aefca9
line wrap: on
line source

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Stats</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Glorious statistics!</h1>
<script>

var evtSource = new EventSource("/stats_stream");

evtSource.addEventListener("stats-full", function(e) {
	var initial_stats = JSON.parse(e.data);
	console.log(initial_stats);

}, false);

evtSource.addEventListener("stats-updated", function(e) {
	var updated_stats = JSON.parse(e.data);
	console.log(updated_stats);

}, false);

</script>
</body>
</html>