Software /
code /
prosody-modules
File
mod_host_blacklist/mod_host_blacklist.lua @ 5705:527c747711f3
mod_http_oauth2: Limit revocation to clients own tokens in strict mode
RFC 7009 section 2.1 states:
> The authorization server first validates the client credentials (in
> case of a confidential client) and then verifies whether the token was
> issued to the client making the revocation request. If this
> validation fails, the request is refused and the client is informed of
> the error by the authorization server as described below.
The first part was already covered (in strict mode). This adds the later
part using the hash of client_id recorded in 0860497152af
It still seems weird to me that revoking a leaked token should not be
allowed whoever might have discovered it, as that seems the responsible
thing to do.
author | Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 29 Oct 2023 11:30:49 +0100 |
parent | 1182:547b3c05cc06 |
line wrap: on
line source
local jid_split = require "util.jid".split; local st = require "util.stanza"; local set = require "util.set"; local select = select; local blacklist = module:get_option_inherited_set("host_blacklist", {}); local function stanza_checker(attr) return function (event) local host = select(2, jid_split(event.stanza.attr[attr])); if blacklist:contains(host) then module:send(st.error_reply(event.stanza, "cancel", "not-allowed", "Communication with this domain is restricted")); return true; end end end check_incoming_stanza = stanza_checker("from"); check_outgoing_stanza = stanza_checker("to"); for stanza_type in set.new{"presence","message","iq"}:items() do for jid_type in set.new{"bare", "full", "host"}:items() do module:hook("pre-"..stanza_type.."/"..jid_type, check_outgoing_stanza, 500); module:hook(stanza_type.."/"..jid_type, check_incoming_stanza, 500); end end